<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WEB 2.0 LEGAL NEWS &#187; user</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web20lawyer.com/techblog/archives/tag/user/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web20lawyer.com/techblog</link>
	<description>informing cyber companies about emerging legal issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Click Fraud Liability and the Meaning of &#8220;User&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://web20lawyer.com/techblog/archives/9</link>
		<comments>http://web20lawyer.com/techblog/archives/9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>web20lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web20lawyer.com/techblog/archives/9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Email
A California district court considered the issue of whether the language of the contract entered into by the advertiser and a Web publisher was such so as to exempt the advertiser from paying fees for fraudulent clicks on its advertisements. The court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that meaning of the term “user” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	Email<br />
A California district court considered the issue of whether the language of the contract entered into by the advertiser and a Web publisher was such so as to exempt the advertiser from paying fees for fraudulent clicks on its advertisements. The court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that meaning of the term “user” was a triable issue. Lambotte v. IAC/InterActiveCorp, (C.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2008). http://xrl.in/1smp</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fweb20lawyer.com%2Ftechblog%2Farchives%2F9&amp;linkname=Click%20Fraud%20Liability%20and%20the%20Meaning%20of%20%26%238220%3BUser%26%238221%3B"><img src="http://web20lawyer.com/techblog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web20lawyer.com/techblog/archives/9/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
